|
followthefleet (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
What's telling for me is that this voice was not part of the thinking of the Bush people. Krugman's ideas were not on their radar...AT ALL. This video is about the weakening of the American middle class...that same middle class that imbibed the rhetoric of the "free-market" ideologues, and voted for Bush. Now it's time to pay the piper!
elmazote (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
in theory yes. in practice, however
high mobility = high underemployment
employers shrewdly take advantage of the situation: jobs often become temporary or part-time, with significantly less benefits.
while i'm not attempting to fully refute your observation, it surely is not so convenient.
best regards!
amisthorn (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Have you looked closely at Krugman's nose? It's not at all beakish.
amisthorn (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
morality originally reflected esthetics. maybe why Nash's mind was 'beautiful".
benitoisamu (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
this man was right all the time. He predicted the burst and the meltdow of the summer.
gorgorybmus (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Economics encompasses and involves a lot of different aspects of society.
garyowen4ever (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
this guy is no populist or champion of the middle class, he loves low low fed rates, which means high high inflation and subsequent food and energy prices. he is a tool and a sttoge for the wealth class.
mreisma (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
this guy reminds of ben bernanke, a big fat rat.
clat1 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
there was very little mobility during the 1950s when our country become the dominant economic power
isgoodno (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Why is an economist sticking his big beak nose into social policies.
Typical jew, trying to tell us all how to think and what's important in america.
What's important to us and what's important to communist jews are usually not the same thing. |
