sidhantprakash (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

she butchers this amazing song! terrible!

ebroome (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

it's a bad ass piece

amplifiedirony (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I love this until 3:00... then you just lose the song.

Luincir (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

she takes the song by its throat.

buzzbasura (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

now you just ruined it.. everybody now is trying to listen to the "loud breaths".. instead of the emotion of the singer that comes with the "loud breaths". do you cry without breathing?..... i thought so.....

buzzbasura (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

um.. recorded live..

mediarulestheworld (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

it's okay but she takes loud breaths a lot and it kind of ruins it. She is a good singer though. it would be good without all of the breaths

mareeblanco (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

its ok...kinda. waaayyy better than other female voices i heard singing it... *cough cough avril lavigne* coldplays version is still the best! (original)

violetrandy (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

i have that guitar :D and i like this version loaddds

Daharen (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

You do know why recording industries promote these types of covers right? Having two separate versions of a song sung by separate genders increases sales, people try and relate to songs, and even try and use them to substitute words increasingly. It helps relate if the person singing the song is the same gender according to most psychological studies. Thus, make a cover in the opposite gender, doubt up sales, take advantage of an overly emotional public, and move on =).