|
titanic1090345 (October 5, 2008 at 8:41 pm)
no, it has to be a mine because the U-Boats where not fast enough to keep up with the Britannic's to top speed to fire at the Britannic
breyerfan23 (October 5, 2008 at 1:28 pm)
stupid it got hit by a missle
MelC54 (October 5, 2008 at 3:17 am)
In reality, Brittanic never carried 1 paying passenger.
donaldengine9 (September 30, 2008 at 6:25 pm)
Thanks, mind went blank for a moment.
chootech2 (September 30, 2008 at 10:22 am)
the Britannic was most likely sank by a underwater mine.
titanic1090345 (September 30, 2008 at 5:42 am)
Yes, it was the Lusitania, the Britannic (White Star Line) was most likely sank by a underwater mine and not a torpedo.
donaldengine9 (September 30, 2008 at 12:24 am)
I thought that was a Cunard ship that was hit by a torpedo
steam2183 (September 28, 2008 at 10:01 pm)
There were lots of differences like Titanic had an enclosed promenade deck Olympic had an open promenade deck that is visibly clear when you see the two sisters side by side Titanic was longer than Olympic and Britanic was longer Than Titanic. The Blue prints had to be different as the workers would have to have worked from these to make all those changes to Titanic Olympic and Britanic. They were not carbon copies of each other.
titanic1090345 (September 28, 2008 at 7:13 pm)
srry wrong because the tonnage displacement of the Britannic was larger than both the Titanic and Olympic, she was also longer than the Titanic and Olympic. Titanic: Length/Beam/Tonnage =882 feet/92.6/46,328 gross tons. Olympic: 882 feet/92.6/45,324 gross tons, then after last refit 46,439. Britannic: 903 feet/94 feet/48,158 gross tons.
Steelhorsetransferco (September 28, 2008 at 5:28 pm)
i respectfuly disagree with you on the size of brittanic due to the fact the blue prints of all three ships are same with the difference of the safety features added over the period of time when they built all three of them are the same length, width, beam, and tonnage displacement. |
