|
pinkflowers28 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Creative Commons rocks!:D
Ennio6pack (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Hi Dr Daring! I agree with you when you say there's not a reflection of contention quality.
But you really think: "Grammar-semantic errors are a consequence of Creative Commons?"
It seems fallacy
Think about it
Ennio - Brasil
DrDaringPhD (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Copyright is an old and outdated method. CC is a new "copyright" for the digital age. It's not reflection of content quality. There's plenty of copyrighted material these days that are poor, to say the least. In the old days books rarely had errors. Now they are replete with errors.
illuminazzo (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
CC sounds like 'Closed Caption' to me!!!
Anyone could mistaken that on a youtube video!!! :p
mekman7 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
CC seems to be a lawyer method of taxing the innocent and the "un-hip." and another form of control... The whole thing and semantics of CC gives me the heebee jeebees.
renyenhawaii (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Then how do I look up the artist's CC license, to find out how he want content is being use?
jmm1233 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Freedom CC :)
i love CC , Lawerence Lewsig is awesome guy , like Talbolt Linus , Bram Cohen , and Richard Stallman and everyone who shares :)
BigAl109 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Yes.
gstorts (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
I work in higher education and create high quality learning objects that I share, without cost, to other educators. If you make your living off of your music, you probably want to use full copyright rather than CC. But it has nothing to do with the quality being poor. After all there's no guarantee that someone who uses full copyright, isn't copyrighting poor content.
rainbowcomputers (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
if Creative Common's isnt suitable to you, dont use it, do not judge content created by others as poor simply cause they opt to use (CC) instead of (C).
If you want all your rights, reserve them with (C) |
