|
shamma1977 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
It also made an "opening" proportional to its size in the tower. Not the case in PA or the Pentagon. Big jets leave debris, go back through every major air accident, there's always something. Don't forgot, 911 had to happen at the scale that it appeared to enrage the public so much and get their blind support and backup when invading those responsible (Afghanistan) and those not so (Iraq). So its plausible that people, from different government agencies knew it was gonna happen.
shamma1977 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
I'd like to contribute my 2 cents here. Nothing I'm gonna say is meant to disrespect anyone, dead or alive, so please no nasty responses. A few crazy Arab extremists flew two jets into the twin towers, we all saw them, we all saw some debris. It is also possible that the rest of those crazy Arabs had hijacked two other planes, but there is NO WAY on earth they crashed where claimed. The jet that hit the second tower came in pretty fast, well over 300 ktns with a lot of fuel BUT it left debris.
okeagle25 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
HEY TONY, you fuck, consider this.
Donald Rumsfeld actually says "shot down the plane", which may be a clue. FIGURE OF SPEECH, DUMBASS. However, at the site, there is no plane wreckage, no luggage, no people, no blood!? A FUCKING 10 TON AIRCRAFT HIT THE GROUND AT 300 KNOTS AT 90 DEGREES!! DUH!! Eyewitnesses on video to confirm. WHO? Original television news alert saying that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland!? LOTTA PLANES IN THE AIR THAT DAY, JACKASS! YOU TAKE CNN's WORD OVER THE FAA?? FUCK U!!
nbm34 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
ADAM PX YOU Moron The Lockerbie bomb blew a fucking boing apart in the air and THAT HAD AIRCRAFT DEBRI FOR MILES AROUND AND THAT POUGHED INTO THE GROUND AT 600 MILES PLUS.
This would cause a tear clearly ploughed through fields, NOT BIG SMOKING HOLES, NO MATTER HOW BIG THEY ARE.
adamP90X (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
as for the press conference from cleveland, that was a delta airlines flight that was believed to have a bomb, but was later determined to have been not credible.
adamP90X (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
he was speaking of the people who comitted the terrorist acts as those who "shot the plane down" he wasn't speaking of military actions on any of those incidences, he was talking about terrorists. Bad word choice, I agree, but that's Rumsfeld for ya.
joeybognar (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
adamP90X: watch this video all the way through OBJECTIVELY, then tell me that you still believe that flight 93 actually crashed in shanksville:
watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&feature=related
adamP90X (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
the technology to call from an airplane has been in place since the early 1990s (at least) via airphones...
faithdimension (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Sorry but the technology to call from planes at that time didnt exist and certainly not from that height. And why would someone call his mother and give his surname? as one passenger supposedly did.
adamP90X (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
You Conspiracy Theorists are idiots...do you think that there would really be any wreckage from an jet aircraft that was traveling well over 600 MPH, full of fuel is going to leave much of anything? It acted as a giant missile. How much of a missile is recoverable after it hits a target? There are family members who received calls from people on board that plane, have some compassion for those that lost loved ones. |
