|
spamvigilante (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Against government spending that isn't necessary or profitable? To WHOM? Did you find it acceptable that Halliburton's stock price more than doubled due to the invasion of Iraq?
But a wind tower that produces megawatts of electricity without harmful radiation or carbon emissions is a problem for you.
Wow, talk about misguided. I hope you at least profited from the KBR spinoff from Halliburton. What, no money in the stock market? Another boob who kowtows to the GOP without rational thought.
mortsdans (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
uh... idk where u are getting this from. i am against all gov spending that isn't necessary or profitable. from dems or republicans. i just want to keep my money instead of it all going to waste for something stupid. like a wind tower cough
subzerotime420 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Nice in theory, but someone get the funding and the land and then try it.
ultravincent (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Sorry but the guy was right.
"MW per second" means power divided by seconds and it's nonsense.
kilowatthour is power MULTIPLIED by time, aka energy.
OUstrmchsr (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
This has not been "invented". It goes off the basic principle of a chimney. Like the ones in the middle ages. It;s not new and no, they should not get the Nobel Prize.
OUstrmchsr (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
1 Watt is one joule per second. 200 megawatts is 200,000,000 joules per second. It's not megawatts per second.
Zwangsman1 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
PHOENIX, Oct. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- EnviroMission Limited (Pink Sheets: EVOMY - News) US power purchase negotiations to deliver the first of two, 200 MW Solar Tower power stations, have been given the green light from Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA).
Solar Tower power station developments planned for Arizona have been approved by SCPPA as suitable renewable energy projects to facilitate the goals of its members' renewable portfolio standards (RPS).
spamvigilante (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Yeah, unlike your support for Hank Paulson's $1.4 trillion in TARP spending with no government oversight. That was okay because he was a Bush appointee, right?
spamvigilante (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Wrong. Amount of energy flow over time is how you pay for your electricity. Ever hear of a kilowatthour?
BrandonPresents (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
if you look at it and think penis, i think that should be a red flag for ya.
but anyways its a good idea, there is hope |
